Straitgate Action Group

Straitgate Farm near Ottery St Mary in Devon was bought in 1965 in the hope it would yield 20 million tonnes of sand & gravel. Straitgate Action Group was formed in 2001 to oppose a quarry due to concerns over water supplies, ancient woodlands, protected species, road safety and more. After finally gaining permission for just 1 million tonnes on appeal, Holcim UK – formerly Aggregate Industries – abandoned its plans in 2025. This blog records the long path to victory.

Pages

  • BLOG
  • Issues
  • Latest
  • History
  • Documents
  • Gallery
  • Maps
  • Devon reserves
  • Press
  • Facts & figures
  • Comments
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact
  • water supplies
  • emissions
  • B3174
  • cattle crossing
  • flooding
  • site access
  • trees
  • soils
  • airport safeguarding
  • planning conditions
  • PZ10

Monday, 11 October 2021

WHPC voice flooding concerns

Posted by Straitgate Action Group
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: flooding
Newer Post Older Post Home
View mobile version


Radio Exe Devoncast Podcast 29:10

LINKS

Appeal Decision
Section 106 unilateral undertaking
Straitgate & Hillhead Public Inquiry
PINS APP/J1155/W/22/3299799
Straitgate application DCC/3944/2017
Straitgate appeal DCC/3944/2017
Hillhead application DCC/3945/2017
Hillhead appeal DCC/3945/2017
Planning Inquiry Documents
Committee Report 1.12.21
EA correspondence
Livestock crossing 20/2542/FUL
Blackhill application DCC/3816/2015
Straitgate application DCC/3774/2015
Blackhill application DCC/3775/2015

Holcim UK Ltd Companies House
Holcim UK press releases
Holcim media releases

Devon Minerals Planning
Devon Minerals Plan 2011–2033
12th Devon Local Aggregates Assessment
DCC Monitoring and Enforcement Plan
DCC Site Monitoring

National Planning Policy Framework
Minerals planning guidance
Mining and quarrying in the UK
Geology around Exeter
Martin Goodall's Planning Law Blog
CPRE How to respond...
Community Planning Alliance
Environmental Law Foundation
Minerals Law

MWWT – latest
Parkhouse 1990 report
Parkhouse 1990 borehole summary
Parkhouse 1990 borehole logs
Geology plan
Archaeology
Haul route

Labels

  • 1968 Public Inquiry (19)
  • A30 (9)
  • activism (23)
  • Aggregate Industries (625)
  • aggregates levy (17)
  • agricultural land (35)
  • airport safeguarding (63)
  • AMEC/AFW/Wood (61)
  • Ancient Woodland (18)
  • AONB (42)
  • appeal (26)
  • archaeology (27)
  • artificial intelligence (5)
  • asphalt (6)
  • B3174 (92)
  • B3174 accident (18)
  • B3180 (28)
  • Barnwell (4)
  • bats (20)
  • biodiversity (48)
  • Birdcage Lane (34)
  • birdstrike (64)
  • Blackhill (82)
  • blog (3)
  • boreholes (33)
  • Breedon (14)
  • CAA (3)
  • Cadhay (37)
  • Cadhay Bog (28)
  • Cadhay Wood (21)
  • carcinogenic (9)
  • cattle crossing (29)
  • cement (56)
  • CEMEX (9)
  • Chard Junction (12)
  • children (21)
  • circular economy (49)
  • climate crisis (249)
  • community relations (42)
  • Competition Commission (5)
  • concept plans (5)
  • conveyancing (2)
  • coronavirus (20)
  • CPRE (6)
  • CSR (7)
  • DCC (234)
  • dormice (42)
  • drones (2)
  • dust (43)
  • economy (57)
  • EDDC (25)
  • energy-from-waste (4)
  • English China Clays (10)
  • English Heritage (2)
  • Environment Agency (120)
  • Environmental Statement (17)
  • Examination (21)
  • Exeter Airport (42)
  • exploration rights (4)
  • Express and Echo (2)
  • falsity (39)
  • flooding (87)
  • fly ash (6)
  • forecasts (4)
  • Foxenhole (2)
  • fracking (17)
  • grading analysis (4)
  • greenwash (73)
  • groundwater (195)
  • Hanson (14)
  • haulage emissions (30)
  • hedgerows (36)
  • Hemerdon Mine (27)
  • heritage assets (7)
  • HGVs (81)
  • Hillhead (83)
  • Historic England (1)
  • history (10)
  • Holcim (71)
  • Holcim UK (9)
  • HSE (4)
  • Hugo Swire MP (16)
  • human rights (30)
  • HVO (4)
  • inert waste (4)
  • jobs (7)
  • judicial review (10)
  • LAA (24)
  • Lafarge Tarmac (3)
  • LafargeHolcim (128)
  • landbank (11)
  • lobbying (13)
  • localism (2)
  • Marshbroadmoor (17)
  • mediaeval fish ponds (29)
  • Minerals Plan (105)
  • mining (51)
  • miscellaneous (15)
  • Moorcroft (3)
  • MPA (66)
  • National Highways (6)
  • Natural England (37)
  • newts (12)
  • nitrates and phosphates (17)
  • noise (4)
  • NPPF (47)
  • Penslade (7)
  • planning (82)
  • planning application (247)
  • planning conditions (56)
  • political donations (2)
  • pollution (52)
  • ponds (12)
  • private water supplies (153)
  • PTES (6)
  • public consultation (23)
  • public relations (37)
  • recycled aggregates (40)
  • resource (47)
  • respirable crystalline silica (24)
  • restoration (59)
  • Rockbeare (39)
  • ROW (54)
  • safety (45)
  • sand and gravel production (45)
  • sand and gravel reserves (40)
  • secondary aggregates (49)
  • showstoppers (8)
  • site access (51)
  • site appraisals (6)
  • soils (21)
  • Somerset (6)
  • SPZ (15)
  • Straitgate Lake (7)
  • Sustainability Appraisal (11)
  • sustainable development (80)
  • Tarmac (7)
  • test pits (18)
  • Thorne Farm Way (6)
  • tourism (4)
  • Transport Assessment (22)
  • trees (18)
  • update (97)
  • Venn Ottery (25)
  • viability (16)
  • visual impact (16)
  • Westleigh (11)
  • Woodbury Common (47)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2025 (29)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2024 (97)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2023 (69)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2022 (47)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (6)
  • ▼  2021 (214)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ▼  October (16)
      • Company planning 4 million km haulage scheme in Devon
      • EA now accepts stream flows would change – with un...
      • ‘You can grow concrete’
      • AI introduces new ‘MWWT +1m criteria’ to comfort LLFA
      • Tackling climate emergency should be ‘top priority...
      • Letter to DCC questions – as we all do – AI’s cred...
      • Sustainable aggregates
      • ‘High-carbon buildings morally indefensible, even ...
      • ‘Newspaper closures open door to corporate crime’
      • South West aggregate trends
      • DCC defers judgement on AI’s Straitgate planning a...
      • Who’s to say this couldn’t happen at Straitgate?
      • WHPC voice flooding concerns
      • ‘You can't trust this company, and you don't want ...
      • Tungsten West plans London IPO to raise funds to r...
      • ‘WTF is a vehicle like that doing on the pavement?!’
    • ►  September (24)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (23)
    • ►  June (19)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (17)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ►  2020 (213)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (18)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (15)
    • ►  April (18)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (28)
    • ►  January (35)
  • ►  2019 (178)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2018 (194)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (28)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2017 (187)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (18)
    • ►  January (29)
  • ►  2016 (151)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2015 (136)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2014 (97)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2013 (121)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2012 (77)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (7)

Search This Blog

APPROVED PLANS – NOW ABANDONED

Overview Plan R22/L/3-3-001 rev B
Detail Area Plan R22/L/3-3-002
Detail Area Plan R22/L/3-3-003 rev A
Detail Area Plan R22/L/3-3-004
Detail Area Plan R22/L/3-3-005
Detail Area Plan R22/L/3-3-006 rev A
Detail Area Plan R22/L/3-3-007 rev A
Detail Area Plan R22/L/3-3-008 rev A
Extraction and Ancillary Development SF/2 rev B
Advance Tree Planting SF/3 rev C
Development Phase 1 SF/5-1 rev C
Development Phase 2 SF/5-2 rev B
Development Phase 3 SF/5-3 rev B
Restoration Scheme SF/6 rev E
Cross sections R22/L/3-3-009 rev A
Cross sections R22/L/3-3-010 rev A
0308.101 rev F Junction improvement scheme layout
0308.104 Junction improvement long section
SF/RS/XX Road Section AB
SF/RS/XX Road Section CD

RANDOM POSTS

  • Is the EA ‘working hard to protect and improve’ our waters, or not?
  • LafargeHolcim CEO: ‘We have to improve our operations to be more sustainable’
  • Aggregate Industries’ parent Holcim announces break-up plan and new CEO
  • ‘With every flood, public anger over the climate crisis is surging’… and other news
  • Groundwater levels continue to rise at Straitgate
  • Aggregate Industries had extra 460k tonnes of sand & gravel up its sleeve all along
  • We’ve fitted some solar panels, crows Holcim UK. What took it so long?
  • ‘More contractors are requesting recycled sand’
  • Aggregate Industries ‘apologise’ for quarry blast mistaken for an earthquake
  • Tungsten West wins permit for Mineral Processing Facility, but loses CEO

PUBLICATIONS CITING SAG

Social Licence to Operate Good Practices and Recent Disputes – Illustrative Examples Across Europe 2021

Social License and Dispute Resolution in the Extractive Industries, Kent et al. 2021

The Facade of Federalist Incongruity: A Political Pretense to a Popular Menace, Varadharajan. GLS Law Journals, Vol. 02, Issue 01; January 2020

Overrated Credence to the Outdated Sand Mining Legislations: A Hydrologically Challenged Measure, Varadharajan. 16th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Rhodes, Greece, September 2019
© Straitgate Action Group